Digital Towers
Future state / Method

Method

Everything on the Future state pages follows from the rules on this page and the public data named here. Nothing is estimated by hand, and no document or data from any government or company that is not public was used.

Hypothetical. Illustrative. Not a recommendation of any authority. Every number here comes from a stated rule applied to public data. It describes a what-if, not a plan, forecast or advice to any country, airport or authority.

1. Airport classes

Each assessed airport gets the first class that fits.

  • Remote or digital, already listed (R). Matches an operational, trial or planned site in the tower dataset by ICAO code.
  • Staffed tower today (T). Has a tower frequency in OurAirports, or the tower flag in the FAA forecast for US airports. This is a proxy: it does not prove the tower is staffed all day, and OurAirports frequency lists are incomplete in some countries.
  • No tower, scheduled passenger service (S). The OurAirports scheduled-service flag.
  • No tower, traffic above threshold (G). A movements or passenger figure at or above the tier 2 level.
  • No tower, infrastructure proxy (P). No traffic figure exists in the loaded tables, but the runway and nearby population suggest a busy airfield.
  • No tower, isolated (I). Far from every other reference airport. This is a distance proxy for remote, medical or island access. No road, medical or ferry data was used.
  • Below threshold (N). Assessed but not a candidate. Counted, not mapped.

2. Suggested service tiers

Tier 1

Full remote tower service

Air traffic control from a remote centre for extended hours or around the clock.

Tier 2

Part-time remote tower

Remote air traffic control in busy periods, advisory service the rest of the day.

Tier 3

Remote advisory (AFIS-like)

Remote flight information and traffic advisories. Not air traffic control.

Tier 4

Surface awareness only

Cameras and surveillance feeds that give an operator or pilots a picture. No separation service.

Hub

Large hub: augment or keep as is

Too large for the simple remote model. Digital augmentation or contingency use only.

3. Every threshold

RuleValueInput
Airport is assessedType small, medium or large; not closed; not military by name; and scheduled service, or a tower, or a runway of 800 m or more. United States: only airports in the FAA forecast, or with scheduled service or a tower.OurAirports; FAA Terminal Area Forecast
Tier 1 (staffed tower today)20,000 or more movements a year, or 250,000 or more passengersNational traffic tables
Tier 2 (staffed tower today)4,000 or more movements, or 10,000 or more passengers
Tier 3 (staffed tower today)Traffic known and below the tier 2 level
Hub, left alone150,000 or more movements, or 5,000,000 or more passengers
Tier 1 (no tower, scheduled service)100,000 or more passengers, or 30,000 or more movements
Tier 2 (no tower, scheduled service)10,000 or more passengers, or 8,000 or more movements
Tier 3 (no tower, scheduled service)Below the tier 2 level
Tier 1 / Tier 2 (no tower, no scheduled service)30,000 or more movements is tier 1; 8,000 or more movements is tier 2Needs a movements figure (United States forecast, UK, Australia, part of Canada)
Tier 3 by infrastructure proxyNo tower, no traffic figure, paved runway of 1,200 m or more, and 25,000 or more people within 25 kmOurAirports; GeoNames
Tier 4, isolatedNo tower, runway of 600 m or more, and no other reference airport within 100 km (reference = scheduled service, a tower, or a paved runway of 1,200 m or more)OurAirports
Unknown traffic, staffed towerLarge airport class is a hub; medium is tier 1; small is tier 2Size class from OurAirports
Unknown traffic, scheduled service, no towerMedium or large class is tier 2; small is tier 3
Hypothetical centreUp to 20 workload units (tier 1 = 1, tier 2 = 0.5, tier 3 = 0.25); airports within 500 km and 20 degrees of longitude of the centre; same countryGreedy placement, existing facilities first
People gapPeople in cities of 15,000 or more within 50 km of an airport, each city counted onceGeoNames cities15000

4. Where hypothetical centres go

Within each country, the airports in tiers 1 to 3 (not hubs, not already remote) are grouped. Candidate sites are airports with a staffed tower today and a medium or large size class, plus operating, trial or planned remote tower centres from this site's dataset. A greedy search picks the site that can take the most workload within 500 km, prefers existing remote tower centres and then existing staffed facilities, and repeats until every airport is placed. If no existing site is in range, the airport itself becomes a "new site", which is penalised so it is used last. Centres never cross a national border. Workload units are an illustration of shared capacity, not a staffing analysis.

5. Data inputs

  • Airports, runways, frequencies: OurAirports open data (public domain), pulled 11 October 2026.
  • Populations: GeoNames cities of 15,000 or more (CC BY 4.0); national population from the World Bank (SP.POP.TOTL, 2024).
  • Existing remote and digital towers: the dataset on this site, every row with its own sources.
  • Traffic: per country, below. Where a table is missing, tiers fall back on infrastructure, and the country page says so.

6. What this is not

  • It is not a recommendation to any authority, airport or air navigation service provider.
  • It is not a business case. There are no costs, benefits or demand forecasts here.
  • It does not know local terrain, weather, airspace, labour agreements, safety history or politics.
  • Tiers can be wrong for any single airport. Use the airport list as a starting question, not an answer.

7. Traffic sources by country

CountryPublic traffic data used
ArgentinaNone loaded. Tiers use runway, size class and scheduled-service flag only.
AustraliaBITRE airport traffic data, passengers and aircraft movements for years ended December (open file on data.gov.au; the file ends in 2020, so 2019 is used)
BelgiumEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
BrazilANAC air transport statistics (Dados Estatisticos do Transporte Aereo), paid plus free passengers by origin and destination airport, 2025
CanadaPassenger and aircraft movement rankings (Statistics Canada, NAV CANADA) as compiled on Wikipedia (top 27 by passengers, top 42 by movements)
ChinaNone loaded. Tiers use runway, size class and scheduled-service flag only.
Czech RepublicEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
DenmarkEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
EstoniaEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
FinlandEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
FranceEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
GermanyEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
GreenlandNone loaded. Tiers use runway, size class and scheduled-service flag only.
Hong KongNone loaded. Tiers use runway, size class and scheduled-service flag only.
HungaryEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
IndiaAirports Authority of India passenger traffic FY2024-25, as compiled on Wikipedia (top 50 airports)
IrelandEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
ItalyEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
JapanMinistry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism airport statistics, as compiled on Wikipedia (top 50; 2024 where given, else 2022)
LithuaniaEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
NetherlandsEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
New ZealandNone loaded. Tiers use runway, size class and scheduled-service flag only.
NorwayEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
PolandEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
QatarNone loaded. Tiers use runway, size class and scheduled-service flag only.
RomaniaEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
Saudi ArabiaNone loaded. Tiers use runway, size class and scheduled-service flag only.
SingaporeNone loaded. Tiers use runway, size class and scheduled-service flag only.
SpainEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
SwedenEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
SwitzerlandEurostat table avia_paoa, passengers on board by reporting airport (latest year available per airport, mostly 2025)
United KingdomUK Civil Aviation Authority, UK airport data 2024 (Table 01 passengers, Table 03.1 aircraft movements)
United StatesFAA Terminal Area Forecast, 2025 final (airport operations and enplanements, base year 2024, tower flag)

Data downloads: summary.json · airports.csv (every candidate airport in the country-page countries, with class, tier and reason) · world_points.json · world_centers.json. Free to reuse with attribution to digitaltowers.org.